On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:00 AM, Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]> wrote:
> @Matt, > > Agree, My vote would be to change existing behavior. > Same. I think its reasonable to say the current behavior is not ideal (otherwise we wouldn't have changed it), and that the new behavior is better for the vast majority of folks. > > -- dims > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Matt Riedemann > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Between patch set 1 and patch set 3 here [1] we have different solutions > to > > the same issue, which is if you don't specify a spacing value for > periodic > > tasks then they run whenever the periodic task processor runs, which is > > non-deterministic and can be staggered if some tasks don't complete in a > > reasonable amount of time. > > > > I'm bringing this to the mailing list to see if there are more opinions > out > > there, especially from operators, since patch set 1 changes the default > > behavior to have the spacing value be the DEFAULT_INTERVAL (hard-coded 60 > > seconds) versus patch set 3 which makes that behavior configurable so the > > admin can set global default spacing for tasks, but defaults to the > current > > behavior of running every time if not specified. > > > > I don't like a new config option, but I'm also not crazy about changing > > existing behavior without consensus. > > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93767/ > > > > -- > > > > Thanks, > > > > Matt Riedemann > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
