On 07/01/2014 10:03 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: > On 1 July 2014 14:44, Anita Kuno <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 07/01/2014 05:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote: >>> For the record, cinder gave a very clear definition of success in our >>> 3rd party guidelines: Passes every test in tempest-dsm-full. If that >>> needs documenting somewhere else, please let me know. It may of course >>> change as we learn more about how 3rd party CI works out, so the fewer >>> places it is duplicated the better, maybe? >>> >> Thanks Duncan, I wasn't aware of this. Can we start with a url for those >> guidelines in your reply to this post and then go from there? > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Cinder/certified-drivers should make > it clear but doesn't, I'll get that cleared up. > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-cinder-3rd-party-cert-and-verification > mentions it, and various weekly meeting minutes also mention it. > > Thanks for sharing those links, Duncan.
Hmmm, my first response - given that long chew we had on the ml[0] about the use of the word certified as well as the short confirmation we had in the tc meeting[1] that the word certified would not be used, but rather some version of the word 'tested' - how long until edits can be made to the cinder wiki to comply with that agreement? Thanks Duncan, Anita. [0] http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/036933.html [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tc/2014/tc.2014-06-17-20.03.html 2.b _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
