Thanks Youcef. I didn't see any results or information for it, it would be excellent if you could reply to the thread with the info and also come to the meeting Monday.
Kyle On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Youcef Laribi <youcef.lar...@citrix.com> wrote: > Vijay, You need to reply to this and inform Kyle that we do have a CI > system. > > > > *From:* Kyle Mestery [mailto:mest...@noironetworks.com] > *Sent:* Friday, July 11, 2014 8:57 AM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] Update on third party > CI in Neutron > > > > Since Juno-2 is quickly approaching, I wanted to update everyone on where > we're at with regards to third party testing in Neutron. The etherpad here >  > was the original link with status. The link here  shows what is > expected of > Neutron third party CI systems. > > On the CI status side, I'd like to ask the owners of the following CI > systems > to attend Monday's third party meeting  to discuss the status of their > CI > systems. These are the ones which appear to be in trouble, aren't running, > or have some issues. > > 1. Cisco > > > 1. Not enough logs being saved. > 2. Log retention issues. > > > 1. Citrix Netscaler LBaaS driver > > > 1. I don't think this has a third party CI system running. > > > 1. Embrane (both plugin and LBaaS driver) > > > 1. Logs are tarred up and not viewable in web browser. > 2. Inconsistent runs at times. > > > 1. IBM SDN-VE > > > 1. Currently inactive, moving to a new system. > > > 1. One Convergence > > > 1. Very high failure rate for patch runs. > > > 1. OpenDaylight > > > 1. Logs are tarred up and not viewable in web browser > > > 1. PLUMgrid > > > 1. Not saving enough logs > > > 1. Radware > > > 1. Logs are not viewable in browser > > > 1. Tail-F > > > 1. Inconsistent past runs, need updates on status. > > > 1. vArmour FWaaS driver > > > 1. Can't view logs. > 2. Inconsistent runs against patches. > > > I'd like to take some time in the Monday meeting to go over the issues > these > CI systems are having and give the maintainers a chance to discuss this > with > us. The third party team is hopeful we can spend the energy in the meeting > working with CI maintainers who are actively interested in making progress > on improving their CI systems. > > Per my email to the list in June , the expectation is that third party > CI > systems in Neutron are running and following the guidelines set forth by > both Neutron and Infra. The weekly meeting is a place to seek help, and > we're happy that a large number of third party CI owners and maintainers > are using this resource. > > I'd also like to encourange anyone with a patch for a plugin or driver in > Neutron > to participate in the third-party meetings going forward as well. This > will help > to ensure your CI system is running while your patch is being reviewed, > and you > actively work to sort out issues during the review process to ensure smooth > merging of your plugin or driver. > > Thank you! > Kyle > >  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/ZLp9Ow3tNq >  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting >  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty >  > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-June/037665.html > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev