On 09/07/14 16:52, Clint Byrum wrote: > Hello! > > I've been looking at the statistics, and doing a bit of review of the > reviewers, and I think we have an opportunity to expand the core reviewer > team in TripleO. We absolutely need the help, and I think these two > individuals are well positioned to do that. > > I would like to draw your attention to this page: > > http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-90.txt > > Specifically these two lines: > > +-------------------+---------------------------------------+----------------+ > | Reviewer | Reviews -2 -1 +1 +2 +A +/- % | Disagreements* | > +-------------------+---------------------------------------+----------------+ > | jonpaul-sullivan | 188 0 43 145 0 0 77.1% | 28 ( 14.9%) | > | lxsli | 186 0 23 163 0 0 87.6% | 27 ( 14.5%) | > > Note that they are right at the level we expect, 3 per work day. And > I've looked through their reviews and code contributions: it is clear > that they understand what we're trying to do in TripleO, and how it all > works. I am a little dismayed at the slightly high disagreement rate, > but looking through the disagreements, most of them were jp and lxsli > being more demanding of submitters, so I am less dismayed. > > So, I propose that we add jonpaul-sullivan and lxsli to the TripleO core > reviewer team.
+1 to both > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev