> Hi all! > > A quick note that SAD has passed. We briskly approved a pile of BPs
it's sad. ;-( > over the weekend, most of them vendor related as low priority, best > effort attempts for Juno-3. At this point, we're hugely oversubscribed > for Juno-3, so it's unlikely we'll make exceptions for things into > Juno-3 now. my specs are ok'ed by Kyle but failed to get another core reviewer. https://review.openstack.org/#/c/98702/ https://review.openstack.org/#/c/103737/ does it indicate core reviewers man-power problems? if so, can you consider increasing the number of them? postponing vendor stuffs (like mine) for the reason would make the situation worse as many of developers/reviewers are paid for vendor stuffs. YAMAMOTO Takashi > > I don't plan to open a Kilo directory in the specs repository quite > yet. I'd like to first let things settle down a bit with Juno-3 before > going there. Once I do, specs which were not approved should be moved > to that directory where they can be reviewed with the idea they are > targeting Kilo instead of Juno. > > Also, just a note that we have a handful of bugs and BPs we're trying > to land in Juno-3 yet today, so core reviewers, please focus on those > today. > > Thanks! > Kyle > > [1] https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-2 > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev