Hi Kyle,

SUSE Cloud ships dnsmasq 2.71 . For us it's fine to bump the minimum
version supported
to 2.63 .

cheers,

Rossella

On 07/30/2014 04:00 AM, Kyle Mestery wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Xuhan Peng <[email protected]> wrote:
>> We bumped the minimum version of dnsmasq to 2.63 a while ago by this code
>> change:
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105378/
>>
>> However, currently we still "kind of" support earlier version of dnsmasq
>> because we only give a warning and don't exit the program when we find
>> dnsmasq version is less than the minimum version. This causes some confusion
>> and complicates the code since we need to take care different syntax of
>> dnsmasq of different version in dhcp code (Note that the previous version
>> doesn't support tag).
>>
>> I wonder what's your opinion on NOT supporting dnsmasq version less than
>> 2.63 in Juno? I think we can prompt error message and exit the program when
>> we detect invalid version but I would like to gather more thoughts on this
>> one.
>>
> I'm personally ok with this hard limit, but I'd really like to hear
> from distribution people here to understand their thoughts, including
> what versions of dnsmasq ship with their products and how this would
> affect them.
>
> Thanks,
> Kyle
>
>> Thanks,
>> Xu Han
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to