On Fri, 2014-08-08 at 09:06 -0400, Russell Bryant wrote: > On 08/07/2014 08:06 PM, Michael Still wrote: > > It seems to me that the tension here is that there are groups who > > would really like to use features in newer libvirts that we don't CI > > on in the gate. Is it naive to think that a possible solution here is > > to do the following: > > > > - revert the libvirt version_cap flag > > I don't feel strongly either way on this. It seemed useful at the time > for being able to decouple upgrading libvirt and enabling features that > come with that.
Right, I suggested the flag as a more deliberate way of avoiding the issue that was previously seen in the gate with live snapshots. I still think it's a pretty elegant and useful little feature, and don't think we need to use it as proxy battle over testing requirements for new libvirt features. Mark. _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev