Le 14 août 2014 22:02, "Michael Still" <mi...@stillhq.com> a écrit : > > Hi. > > We're rapidly approaching j-3, so I want to remind people of the > current reviews that are high priority. The definition of high > priority I am using here is blueprints that are marked high priority > in launchpad that have outstanding code for review -- I am sure there > are other reviews that are important as well, but I want us to try to > land more blueprints than we have so far. These are listed in the > order they appear in launchpad. > > == Compute Manager uses Objects (Juno Work) == > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/compute-manager-objects-juno,n,z > > This is ongoing work, but if you're after some quick code review > points they're very easy to review and help push the project forward > in an important manner. > > == Move Virt Drivers to use Objects (Juno Work) == > > I couldn't actually find any code out for review for this one apart > from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94477/, is there more out there? > > == Add a virt driver for Ironic == > > This one is in progress, but we need to keep going at it or we wont > get it merged in time. > > * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111223/ was approved, but a rebased > ate it. Should be quick to re-approve. > * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111423/ > * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111425/ > * ...there are more reviews in this series, but I'd be super happy to > see even a few reviewed > > == Create Scheduler Python Library == > > * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82778/ > * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104556/ > > (There are a few abandoned patches in this series, I think those two > are the active ones but please correct me if I am wrong). >
Nope that's OK, those are the only one implementing the spec. We had a +2 on 82778 but it needed a rebase, FYI. > == VMware: spawn refactor == > > * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104145/ > * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104147/ (Dan Smith's -2 on this one > seems procedural to me) > * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105738/ > * ...another chain with many more patches to review > > Thanks, > Michael > > -- > Rackspace Australia > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
