I have also been reminded that http://54.201.139.117/nova-bugs.html
tracks bugs with outstanding code reviews (click on "ready for
review"). There are 179 at the moment, so it sure would be cool to
land some bug fixes.

Thanks,
Michael

On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 5:57 AM, Michael Still <mi...@stillhq.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> We're rapidly approaching j-3, so I want to remind people of the
> current reviews that are high priority. The definition of high
> priority I am using here is blueprints that are marked high priority
> in launchpad that have outstanding code for review -- I am sure there
> are other reviews that are important as well, but I want us to try to
> land more blueprints than we have so far. These are listed in the
> order they appear in launchpad.
>
> == Compute Manager uses Objects (Juno Work) ==
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/nova+branch:master+topic:bp/compute-manager-objects-juno,n,z
>
> This is ongoing work, but if you're after some quick code review
> points they're very easy to review and help push the project forward
> in an important manner.
>
> == Move Virt Drivers to use Objects (Juno Work) ==
>
> I couldn't actually find any code out for review for this one apart
> from https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94477/, is there more out there?
>
> == Add a virt driver for Ironic ==
>
> This one is in progress, but we need to keep going at it or we wont
> get it merged in time.
>
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111223/ was approved, but a rebased
> ate it. Should be quick to re-approve.
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111423/
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/111425/
> * ...there are more reviews in this series, but I'd be super happy to
> see even a few reviewed
>
> == Create Scheduler Python Library ==
>
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82778/
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104556/
>
> (There are a few abandoned patches in this series, I think those two
> are the active ones but please correct me if I am wrong).
>
> == VMware: spawn refactor ==
>
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104145/
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/104147/ (Dan Smith's -2 on this one
> seems procedural to me)
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/105738/
> * ...another chain with many more patches to review
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
>
> --
> Rackspace Australia



-- 
Rackspace Australia

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to