On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Jay Bryant <jsbry...@electronicjungle.net> wrote:
> +2 > > I prefer the LOG.warning format and support that given the documentation > you shared. > > If there is agreement I would create a hacking check. > I think a better approach is to just not care which i used here. IMHO mixing up LOG.warn and LOG.warning doesn't hurt readability in any meaningful way. And not caring will result in less churn for very little benefit. > Jay > On Aug 17, 2014 1:28 AM, "Gary Kotton" <gkot...@vmware.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> Over the last few weeks I have seen a number of patches where LOG.warn is >> replacing LOG.warning. I think that if we do something it should be the >> opposite as warning is the documented one in python 2 and 3 >> https://docs.python.org/3/howto/logging.html. >> Any thoughts? >> Thanks >> Gary >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
