Dane, It is not my intention to damage anyone's image or work. I ran a test and I noticed that APIC CI was giving a PASSED result when it was not even running anything, for me that means "fake". I just responded to your other email, I adopt see APIC CI running and I can't change the wiki until I verify it.
I am online and you can contact me on IRC. Thanks, Edgar On 8/15/14, 5:13 PM, "Dane Leblanc (leblancd)" <lebla...@cisco.com> wrote: >Edgar: > >For the Notes for the Cisco APIC, can you change the comment "results are >fake" to something like "results are only valid for APIC-related >commits"? I think this more accurately represents our current results >(for reasons we chatted about on another thread). > >Thanks, >Dane > >-----Original Message----- >From: Edgar Magana [mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com] >Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 6:36 PM >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are >required to be run >Importance: High > >Team, > >I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins >and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits. >I created a report here: >https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugi >n >_and_Drivers > > >We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So >please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI. >I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability: > >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/ > >https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/ > > >I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and >failing for the second but I got so many surprises. > >Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore >this report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from >Neutron tree. > >Cheers, > >Edgar > >P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty >job! > > >On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: > >>Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests. >>Per the requirements wiki page here , everyone needs to be running >>more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron >>third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a >>third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below and >>make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have questions, the >>weekly third-party meeting  is a great place to ask questions. >> >>Thanks, >>Kyle >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty >> >>_______________________________________________ >>OpenStack-dev mailing list >>OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStackemail@example.com >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >_______________________________________________ >OpenStack-dev mailing list >OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev