I also added a two more nodes to our cluster to reduce the delay. Can we establish a maximum time to vote on the wiki? On Aug 19, 2014 9:39 AM, "Edgar Magana" <edgar.mag...@workday.com> wrote:
> Kevin, > > I just verified, Thanks a lot. > > Edgar > > From: Kevin Benton <blak...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Date: Friday, August 15, 2014 at 4:56 PM > To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] [third-party] What tests are > required to be run > > You didn't wait long enough for the Big Switch CI to reach your > negative test. :-) > Currently the CI system is backed by about 100 patches to push responses > out ~22 hours. > > This does bring up an old discussion that was never resolved. > What is the minimum expected response time for CI systems? > > > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Edgar Magana <edgar.mag...@workday.com> > wrote: > >> Team, >> >> I did a quick audit on the Neutron CI. Very sad results. Only few plugins >> and drivers are running properly and testing all Neutron commits. >> I created a report here: >> >> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron_Plugins_and_Drivers#Existing_Plugin >> _and_Drivers >> >> >> We will discuss the actions to take on the next Neutron IRC meeting. So >> please, reach me out to clarify what is the status of your CI. >> I had two commits to quickly verify the CI reliability: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114393/ >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/40296/ >> >> >> I would expect all plugins and drivers passing on the first one and >> failing for the second but I got so many surprises. >> >> Neutron code quality and reliability is a top priority, if you ignore this >> report that plugin/driver will be candidate to be remove from Neutron >> tree. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Edgar >> >> P.s. I hate to be the inquisitor hereŠ but someone has to do the dirty >> job! >> >> >> On 8/14/14, 8:30 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mest...@mestery.com> wrote: >> >> >Folks, I'm not sure if all CI accounts are running sufficient tests. >> >Per the requirements wiki page here [1], everyone needs to be running >> >more than just Tempest API tests, which I still see most neutron >> >third-party CI setups doing. I'd like to ask everyone who operates a >> >third-party CI account for Neutron to please look at the link below >> >and make sure you are running appropriate tests. If you have >> >questions, the weekly third-party meeting [2] is a great place to ask >> >questions. >> > >> >Thanks, >> >Kyle >> > >> >[1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/NeutronThirdPartyTesting >> >[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >OpenStack-dev mailing list >> >OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > > -- > Kevin Benton > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev