On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 03:17:40PM +0000, Tim Bell wrote:
> Michael has been posting very informative blogs on the summary of
> the mid-cycle meetups for Nova. The one on the Nova Network to
> Neutron migration was of particular interest to me as it raises a
> number of potential impacts for the CERN production cloud. The blog
> itself is at http://www.stillhq.com/openstack/juno/000014.html

FWIW, I do *not* support the following policy statement written
there

  "The current plan is to go forward with a cold upgrade path,
   unless a user comes forward with an absolute hard requirement
   for a live upgrade, and a plan to fund developers to work on it."

I think that saying that our users are responsible for providing or
identifying funding for live upgrades is user-hostile & unacceptable.
If we as a dev team want to take away major features that our users
currently rely on in production and the users then determine (& tell
us) that the proposed upgrade path is not practical, then it is the
*dev team's* reponsibility to figure out how address that, not the
users.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to