I see no other quick solutions in 5.1. We can find the difference in packages between 5.0 and 5.0.2, put only updated packages in tarball and get missed packages from existing repos on master node.
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Scherbakov <mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote: > What are other possible solutions to this issue? > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov <dpyz...@mirantis.com> > wrote: > >> Fuelers, >> >> Our upgrade tarball for 5.1 is more than 4.5Gb. We can reduce it size by >> 2Gb with lrzip tool (ticket >> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/fuel/+bug/1356813>, change in build system >> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114201/>, change in docs >> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/115331/>), but it will dramatically >> increase unpacking time. I've run unpack on my virtualbox environment and >> got this result: >> [root@fuel var]# lrzuntar fuel-5.1-upgrade.tar.lrz >> Decompressing... >> 100% 7637.48 / 7637.48 MB >> Average DeCompression Speed: 8.014MB/s >> [OK] - 8008478720 bytes >> Total time: 00:15:52.93 >> >> My suggestion is to reject this change, release 5.1 with big tarball and >> find another solution in next release. Any objections? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> > > > -- > Mike Scherbakov > #mihgen > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackemail@example.com > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev