Hi, I think 15 minutes is not too bad. Additionally, it will reduce download time and price for bandwidth. It's worth to leave lrzip for customers, as upgrade is one time operation so user can wait for a while. For development it would be nice to have the fastest solution to boost development time.
-- Best regards, Sergii Golovatiuk, Skype #golserge IRC #holser On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Igor Kalnitsky <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Hmm.. I think ~15 minutes isn't long enough to skip this approach in > production. > What about using lrzip only for end-users, but keep regular tarball > for CI and internal usage? > > Thanks, > Igor > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I see no other quick solutions in 5.1. We can find the difference in > > packages between 5.0 and 5.0.2, put only updated packages in tarball and > get > > missed packages from existing repos on master node. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Mike Scherbakov < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> What are other possible solutions to this issue? > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Dmitry Pyzhov <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Fuelers, > >>> > >>> Our upgrade tarball for 5.1 is more than 4.5Gb. We can reduce it size > by > >>> 2Gb with lrzip tool (ticket, change in build system, change in docs), > but it > >>> will dramatically increase unpacking time. I've run unpack on my > virtualbox > >>> environment and got this result: > >>> [root@fuel var]# lrzuntar fuel-5.1-upgrade.tar.lrz > >>> Decompressing... > >>> 100% 7637.48 / 7637.48 MB > >>> Average DeCompression Speed: 8.014MB/s > >>> [OK] - 8008478720 bytes > >>> Total time: 00:15:52.93 > >>> > >>> My suggestion is to reject this change, release 5.1 with big tarball > and > >>> find another solution in next release. Any objections? > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Mike Scherbakov > >> #mihgen > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
