By which John means "generally trying to avoid filling". Michael
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 10:52 AM, John Garbutt <j...@johngarbutt.com> wrote: > On 2 September 2014 15:27, Matthew Booth <mbo...@redhat.com> wrote: >> We've been playing a game recently between oslo.vmware and the refactor >> series where a patch from the refactor series goes in, requiring a >> rebase of oslo.vmware daily. After a brief discussion with garyk earlier >> I decided to head that off by rebasing the refactor series on top of >> oslo.vmware, which has been sat in the integrated queue in the gate for >> over 5 hours now. i.e. Whether it succeeds or fails, it will now go in >> before anything else. >> >> Unfortunately, in doing that I have had to lose +2 +A on 4 refactor >> series patches. I made a note of who had approved them: >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109754/ >> Brian Elliott +2 >> John Garbutt +2 +A >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/109755/ >> Daniel Berrange +2 >> Andrew Laski +2 >> John Garbutt +2 +A >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/114817/ >> Brian Elliott +2 >> Andrew Laski +2 >> John Garbutt +2 +A >> >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/117467/ >> Brian Elliott +2 >> Andrew Laski +2 >> John Garbutt +2 +A >> >> These patches have been lightly touched to resolve merge conflicts with >> the oslo.vmware integration, but no more. If people could take another >> quick look I'd be very grateful. > > If stuff was approved, and you have rebased, just reach out for cores > on (or us) on IRC. Thats a general invite, particularly at this FF > sort of time. > > Generally trying to to fill the ML with review requests. > > Cheers, > John > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev -- Rackspace Australia _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev