Hi all, Emma, thanks for raising this topic, I've added it for the next Cinder weekly meeting [1].
Duncan, I absolutely agree with you that if any code could be located in a one place, it must be there. I'm not sure which place is the best for Brick: oslo or stackforge. Let's discuss it. I want to be a volunteer to make Brick as a separate library and make OpenStack code better with re-using code as much, as possible. [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderMeetings#Next_meeting Regards, Ivan Kolodyazhny, Software Engineer, Mirantis Inc On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Duncan Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2 September 2014 04:56, Emma Lin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Gurus, > > I saw the wiki page for Cinder Brick proposal for Havana, but I didn’t > see > > any follow up on that idea. Is there any real progress on that idea? > > > > As this proposal is to address the local storage issue, I’d like to know > the > > status, and to see if there is any task required for hypervisor provider. > > Hi Emma > > Brick didn't really evolve to cover the local storage case, so we've > not made much progress in that direction. > > Local storage comes up fairly regularly, but solving all of the points > (availability, API behaviour completeness, performance, scheduling) > from a pure cinder PoV is a hard problem - i.e. making local storage > look like a normal cinder volume. Specs welcome, email me if you want > more details on the problems - there are certainly many people > interested in seeing the problem solved. > > There is code in brick that could be used in nova as is to reduce > duplication and give a single place to fix bugs - nobody has yet taken > this work on as far as I know. > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
