> >> Anyway, not enough to -1 it, but enough to at least say something. > >> > > > > .. but I do not want to get into the discussion about software testing > > here, not the place really. > > > > However, I do think it is very harmful to respond to FFE request with > > such blanket statements and generalizations, if only for the message it > > sends to the contributors (that we really care more about upholding our > > own myths as a community than users and features). > > > > > > I believe you brought this up as one of your justifications for the FFE. > When I read your statement it does sound as though you want to put > experimental code in at the final release. I am sure that is not what > you had in mind, but I am also sure you can also understand Sean's point > of view. His point is clear and pertinent to your request. > > > > As the person responsible for Nova in HP I will be interested to see how > it operates in practice. I can assure you we will do extensive testing > on it before it goes into the wild and we will not put it into practice > if we are not happy. >
That is awesome and we as a project are lucky to have that! I would not want things put into practice that users can't use or see huge flaws with. I can't help but read this as you being OK with the feature going ahead, though :). Actually, let's say I have no particular objection. Just thought Sean's point is worth noting. Now, if this had been done as an extensible resource I could easily decouple deploying it from all the bug fixes that come through with the release. But that's another matter... Paul
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
