On Tue, Sep 9, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Stanislaw Bogatkin <sbogat...@mirantis.com>
wrote:

> >So I think that we need to start on [3]. As this is required for OSt
> public
> >endpoint SSL and also for Fuel SSL it can be quicker to make a first stage
> >where a self-signed certificate is managed from nailgun and a second stage
> >with the docker CA...
> So, yes, I think that it is good idea, cause it will be good base for [2]
> and [3]
>
> [1] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/ca-deployment
> [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/fuel-ssl-endpoints
> [3] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuel/+spec/ssl-endpoints
>

+1

I totally agree that we should start with [1] first and later focus on [2]
and [3].

I'll also update [2] to adjust it to the plan you proposed.


Best,
Sebastian
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to