On 09/16/2014 04:12 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:30:26AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Russell Bryant <rbry...@redhat.com> wrote:
On 09/15/2014 05:42 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 07:07:13AM +1000, Michael Still wrote:
Just an observation from the last week or so...
The biggest problem nova faces at the moment isn't code review latency. Our
biggest problem is failing to fix our bugs so that the gate is reliable.
The number of rechecks we've done in the last week to try and land code is
I consider both problems to be pretty much equally as important. I don't
think solving review latency or test reliabilty in isolation is enough to
save Nova. We need to tackle both problems as a priority. I tried to avoid
getting into my concerns about testing in my mail on review team bottlenecks
since I think we should address the problems independantly / in parallel.
Agreed with this. I don't think we can afford to ignore either one of them.
Yes, that was my point. I don't mind us debating how to rearrange
hypervisor drivers. However, if we think that will solve all our
problems we are confused.
So, how do we get people to start taking bugs / gate failures more
I think we should have formal "Bug squash wednesdays" (or pick another
day). By this I mean that the core reviewers will focus their attention
on just reviews that are related to bug fixing. They will also try to
work on bugs if they have time and encourage everyone else involved in
Nova todo the same. We'd have a team of people in the Nova IRC channel
to publicise & co-ordinate bug squashing, perhaps with a list of top
20 bugs we want to attack this week. I wouldn't focus just on gate bugs
here since many a pretty darn hard & so would put off many people. Have
a mix of bugs of varying difficulties to point people to. Make this a
regular fortnightly or even weekly event which we publicise in advance
on mailing lists, etc.
+1, I've suggested similar in the past.
OpenStack-dev mailing list