On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >> Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it should >> be a sub-project of the Storage program. While it is targeted for use >> by multiple projects, it's pretty specific to interacting with Cinder, >> right? If so, it seems like Oslo wouldn't be a good fit. We'd just end >> up adding all of cinder-core to the project anyway. :-) > > +1 I think the same arguments and conclusions we had on glance-store > make sense here. I'd probably go with having it under the Block Storage > program. I agree. I’m sure we could find some Oslo contributors to give you advice about APIs if you like, but I don’t think the library needs to be part of Oslo to be reusable. Doug > > Flavio > >> >> -Ben >> >> On 09/16/2014 12:49 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: >>> Hi Stackers! >>> >>> I'm working on moving Brick out of Cinder for K release. >>> >>> There're a lot of open questions for now: >>> >>> - Should we move it to oslo or somewhere on stackforge? >>> - Better architecture of it to fit all Cinder and Nova requirements >>> - etc. >>> >>> Before starting discussion, I've created some proof-of-concept to try it. I >>> moved Brick to some lib named oslo.storage for testing only. It's only one >>> of the possible solution to start work on it. >>> >>> All sources are aviable on GitHub [1], [2]. >>> >>> [1] - I'm not sure that this place and name is good for it, it's just a PoC. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/e0ne/oslo.storage >>> [2] https://github.com/e0ne/cinder/tree/brick - some tests still failed. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ivan Kolodyazhny >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e...@e0ne.info> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi All! >>>> >>>> I would to start moving Cinder Brick [1] to oslo as was described on >>>> Cinder mid-cycle meetup [2]. Unfortunately I missed meetup so I want be >>>> sure that nobody started it and we are on the same page. >>>> >>>> According to the Juno 3 release, there was not enough time to discuss [3] >>>> on the latest Cinder weekly meeting and I would like to get some feedback >>>> from the all OpenStack community, so I propose to start this discussion on >>>> mailing list for all projects. >>>> >>>> I anybody didn't started it and it is useful at least for both Nova and >>>> Cinder I would to start this work according oslo guidelines [4] and >>>> creating needed blueprints to make it finished until Kilo 1 is over. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBrick >>>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-meetup-summer-2014 >>>> [3] >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044608.html >>>> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny. >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > -- > @flaper87 > Flavio Percoco > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev