On Sep 17, 2014 3:48 PM, "Walter A. Boring IV" <walter.bor...@hp.com> wrote: > > Thanks for the effort Ivan. Your interest in brick is also helping us push forward with the idea of the agent that we've had in mind for quite some time. > > For those interested, I have created an etherpad that discusses some of the requirements and design decisions/discussion on the cinder/storage agent > here: > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-storage-agent > > > Walt > > >> Thanks a lot for a comments! >> >> As discussed in IRC (#openstack-cinder), moving Brick to Oslo or Stackforge isn't the best solution. >> >> We're moving on making Cinder Agent (or Cinder Storage agent) [1] based on Brick code instead of making Brick as a separate python library used in Cinder and Nova. >> >> I'll deprecate my oslo.storage GitHub repo and rename it to not confuse anybody in a future. >> >> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-storage-agent >> >> Regards, >> Ivan Kolodyazhny, >> Web Developer, >> http://blog.e0ne.info/, >> http://notacash.com/, >> http://kharkivpy.org.ua/ >> >> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +1 to Doug's comments. >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Doug Hellmann <d...@doughellmann.com> wrote: >>> > >>> > On Sep 16, 2014, at 6:02 PM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> > >>> >> On 09/16/2014 11:55 PM, Ben Nemec wrote: >>> >>> Based on my reading of the wiki page about this it sounds like it should >>> >>> be a sub-project of the Storage program. While it is targeted for use >>> >>> by multiple projects, it's pretty specific to interacting with Cinder, >>> >>> right? If so, it seems like Oslo wouldn't be a good fit. We'd just end >>> >>> up adding all of cinder-core to the project anyway. :-) >>> >> >>> >> +1 I think the same arguments and conclusions we had on glance-store >>> >> make sense here. I'd probably go with having it under the Block Storage >>> >> program. >>> > >>> > I agree. I’m sure we could find some Oslo contributors to give you advice about APIs if you like, but I don’t think the library needs to be part of Oslo to be reusable. >>> > >>> > Doug >>> > >>> >> >>> >> Flavio >>> >> >>> >>> >>> >>> -Ben >>> >>> >>> >>> On 09/16/2014 12:49 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Stackers! >>> >>>> >>> >>>> I'm working on moving Brick out of Cinder for K release. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> There're a lot of open questions for now: >>> >>>> >>> >>>> - Should we move it to oslo or somewhere on stackforge? >>> >>>> - Better architecture of it to fit all Cinder and Nova requirements >>> >>>> - etc. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Before starting discussion, I've created some proof-of-concept to try it. I >>> >>>> moved Brick to some lib named oslo.storage for testing only. It's only one >>> >>>> of the possible solution to start work on it. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> All sources are aviable on GitHub [1], [2]. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> [1] - I'm not sure that this place and name is good for it, it's just a PoC. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> [1] https://github.com/e0ne/oslo.storage >>> >>>> [2] https://github.com/e0ne/cinder/tree/brick - some tests still failed. >>> >>>> >>> >>>> Regards, >>> >>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny >>> >>>> >>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Ivan Kolodyazhny <e...@e0ne.info> wrote: >>> >>>> >>> >>>>> Hi All! >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I would to start moving Cinder Brick [1] to oslo as was described on >>> >>>>> Cinder mid-cycle meetup [2]. Unfortunately I missed meetup so I want be >>> >>>>> sure that nobody started it and we are on the same page. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> According to the Juno 3 release, there was not enough time to discuss [3] >>> >>>>> on the latest Cinder weekly meeting and I would like to get some feedback >>> >>>>> from the all OpenStack community, so I propose to start this discussion on >>> >>>>> mailing list for all projects. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> I anybody didn't started it and it is useful at least for both Nova and >>> >>>>> Cinder I would to start this work according oslo guidelines [4] and >>> >>>>> creating needed blueprints to make it finished until Kilo 1 is over. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/CinderBrick >>> >>>>> [2] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/cinder-meetup-summer-2014 >>> >>>>> [3] >>> >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2014-September/044608.html >>> >>>>> [4] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Oslo/CreatingANewLibrary >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> Regards, >>> >>>>> Ivan Kolodyazhny. >>> >>>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> >>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> >>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> @flaper87 >>> >> Flavio Percoco >>> >> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >>> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> OpenStack-dev mailing list >>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
FWIW my take has been storage lib, not Oslo.
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev