On 09/18/2014 01:12 PM, Dean Troyer wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 1:53 PM, Monty Taylor <mord...@inaugust.com> wrote:
>> I've recently been thinking a lot about Sean's Layers stuff. So I wrote
>> a blog post which Jim Blair and Devananda were kind enough to help me edit.
> Thanks for writing that Monty.  Sean took a concept meant for organizing
> the relationships in DevStack and Grenade and made it relatable to
> OpenStack as a whole.  This brings it out where we can actually use it as a
> model.
> I do think there is value in distinctions between the original layers 1,2
> and 3 (you combined 1 and 2).  But for non-technical purposes 1 and 2 are
> indeed the same.
> Suggestion 6: Isn't it funny how everything old is new again?  The DevStack
> exercises started out as exactly this, then grew more functional over time
> until Tempest came along.  How hipster is that?

Dude. So hipster.

> Suggestion 9:  Wouldn't it be wonderful if a small set of cloud definition
> files could be used for the myriad of user tools out there?  Standards, we
> don't have enough of them!
> In the long term I would like to see more of our base (toolsets and
> services) be pluggable so that the less-blessed projects can participate
> without requiring additions to the base repos.  This should also be true
> for user-facing tools.  OpenStackClient already picks up installed plugins
> with the proper entry points configured so everything doesn't need to be in
> the primary repo to play along.


OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to