On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Joe Gordon wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Chris Dent <chd...@redhat.com> wrote:
For constraints: Will tempest be available as a stable library? Is using
tempest (or other same library across all projects) a good or bad thing?
Seems there's some disagreement on both of these.
Yes, there is a separate thread on spinning out a tempest-lib (not sure on
what final name will be yet) that functional tests can use. Although I
think there is a lot to be done before needing the tempest-lib.
What's the status of tempest-lib? Looking at the repo it appears
that other things may be taking priority at the moment.
As I said in notifications thread: With summit approaching and kilo
open for business, now seems to be talking about what kinds of
structure we want to apply to in-tree functional testing.
Chris Dent tw:@anticdent freenode:cdent
OpenStack-dev mailing list