Hi,

Dima, that's really good approach. 

Mike, technical writer may ask developer and assign bug to him/her if bug 
impacts developer documentation only.

Best Regards,
Sergii Golovatiuk

> On 08 Oct 2014, at 21:08, Mike Scherbakov <mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Dmitry,
> let's try to go this way and correct process if needed when we get first 
> results.
> 
> > Where is your 80% dev vs user docs figure coming from?
> it's no more than my guess. We will see real number over time.
> 
>> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Dmitry Borodaenko 
>> <dborodae...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>> At the moment OpenStack infrastructure doesn't allow to customize the
>> bugs it creates, we should propose a patch at some point to implement
>> that. When we do, I think we should assign such bugs automatically to
>> fuel-docs team.
>> 
>> I don't think we should separate user and dev docs bugs, we're working
>> in the opposite direction towards merging dev docs into fuel-docs:
>> https://review.openstack.org/124551
>> 
>> Where is your 80% dev vs user docs figure coming from?
>> 
>> I think that whether it's dev or user documentation, a technical
>> writer should drive the process, collect information from the commit
>> author, and add it to the right documentation areas. It's commit
>> author's responsibility to provide an informative commit message in
>> the first place, to answer technical writer's questions, and to review
>> docs commits that address the DocImpact bug.
>> 
>> On Oct 8, 2014 10:59 AM, "Mike Scherbakov" <mscherba...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Very good improvement in our documentation process.
>> >
>> > Is there a way to configure it, so bugs would be created with tag "docs" 
>> > automatically? It would simplify triaging process I believe.
>> > From the other hand, as far as I understand, up to 80% of commits with 
>> > "DocImpact" will impact development documentation (or it's intended to be 
>> > affecting only user documentation?). It would be hard for tech writers, 
>> > who are mostly specialized in Fuel user docs, to work on low-level details 
>> > of how, let's say, l23network [1] works.
>> > Do we want to separate docs bugs somehow, user/dev?
>> >
>> > In other words, what would be the flow, who becomes responsible for fixing 
>> > bugs created automatically by Infra?
>> >
>> > [1] 
>> > https://github.com/stackforge/fuel-library/tree/master/deployment/puppet/l23network
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Sergii Golovatiuk 
>> > <sgolovat...@mirantis.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Fuel Summit '2014 we discussed our Documentation process. According to 
>> >> follow up we aligned it to OpenStack 'DocImpact' process. The new process 
>> >> has been tested on background by me and Bogdan Dobrelya. Today, I have 
>> >> updated Fuel Documentation Process so we are making it official.
>> >>
>> >> Why?
>> >> Developer perspective:
>> >> It gives more flexibility for the developers to participate in 
>> >> Documentation Process. Every time when the Reviewer sees that patch 
>> >> requires Documentation update, it may ask the Commiter to update 'Commit 
>> >> Message' with DocImpact message. Once patch passes the review Openstack 
>> >> Infra will trigger a new bug in Launchpad that should be assigned to Fuel 
>> >> Documentation team.
>> >>
>> >> From Fuel Documentation Team perspective:
>> >> When Fuel Documentation Team sees this bug they know who was the commiter 
>> >> and reviewers and whom they should add for documentation review.
>> >>
>> >> Community:
>> >> Community member may ask the developer to put 'DocImpact' message when 
>> >> it's required.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Mike Scherbakov
> #mihgen
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to