? 2014?10?22? 23:18, Ben Nemec ??:
Please don't send review requests to the list. The preferred methods of
asking for reviews are discussed in this post:
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2013-September/015264.html
Thanks.
-Ben
hi Ben,
thanks for letting me know this. and I've noticed it.
but I am not sending review request, I'd like to bring up an discussion
what is the correct behavior when we get the
InterfaceDetachFailed exception.
currently , user can not notice he detach an interface failed, the
exception was not handled,
and the port is deleted in neutron but guest still can see it.
I add the patch link just show you my propose, for better to understand,
I'd like more people to discuss this.
BR
-Eli.
On 10/22/2014 02:57 AM, Eli Qiao wrote:
hi all.
when I am reviewing code of in nova/compute/manager.py
I find that the detach_interface calls deallocate port from neutron first
then calls detach_interface in the hypervisor, then what will happen if
hypervisor detach_interface failed? the result is the port can be seen
on guest but removed from neutron, this seems inconsistent.
I submit a patch [1] to propose remove port from neutron side after
hypervisor
detach_interface successfully, and keep neutron port if catch exception when
detach_interface then give a log message.
can some one kindly help to take a look at it and give some comments?
[1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130151/
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
--
Thanks,
Eli (Li Yong) Qiao
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
