Hi,

really interesting, thanks corry.
during l3 meeting we spoke about planning a POD session around bgp use cases.
at least 2 spec have bgp use cases :

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/125401/
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93329/

It would be interesting that you join this POD, to share your view and
leverage bgp capabilities that will be introduced in kilo for the
calico project.

Mathieu


On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 8:44 AM, A, Keshava <keshav...@hp.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Current Open-stack was built as flat network.
>
> With the introduction of the L3 lookup (by inserting the routing table in
> forwarding path) and separate ‘VIF Route Type’ interface:
>
>
>
> At what point of time in the packet processing  decision will be made to
> lookup FIB  during ? For each packet there will additional  FIB lookup ?
>
> How about the  impact on  ‘inter compute traffic’, processed by  DVR  ?
>
>
>
> Here thinking  OpenStack cloud as hierarchical network instead of Flat
> network ?
>
>
>
> Thanks & regards,
>
> Keshava
>
>
>
> From: Rohit Agarwalla (roagarwa) [mailto:roaga...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 12:36 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] New specs on routed networking
>
>
>
> Hi
>
>
>
> I'm interested as well in this model. Curious to understand the routing
> filters and their implementation that will enable isolation between tenant
> networks.
>
> Also, having a BoF session on "Virtual Networking using L3" may be useful to
> get all interested folks together at the Summit.
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Rohit
>
>
>
> From: Kevin Benton <blak...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Friday, October 24, 2014 12:51 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron][nova] New specs on routed networking
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Thanks for posting this. I am interested in this use case as well.
>
>
>
> I didn't find a link to a review for the ML2 driver. Do you have any more
> details for that available?
>
> It seems like not providing L2 connectivity between members of the same
> Neutron network conflicts with assumptions ML2 will make about segmentation
> IDs, etc. So I am interested in seeing how exactly the ML2 driver will bind
> ports, segments, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kevin Benton
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Cory Benfield
> <cory.benfi...@metaswitch.com> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Project Calico [1] is an open source approach to virtual networking based on
> L3 routing as opposed to L2 bridging.  In order to accommodate this approach
> within OpenStack, we've just submitted 3 blueprints that cover
>
> -  minor changes to nova to add a new VIF type [2]
> -  some changes to neutron to add DHCP support for routed interfaces [3]
> -  an ML2 mechanism driver that adds support for Project Calico [4].
>
> We feel that allowing for routed network interfaces is of general use within
> OpenStack, which was our motivation for submitting [2] and [3].  We also
> recognise that there is an open question over the future of 3rd party ML2
> drivers in OpenStack, but until that is finally resolved in Paris, we felt
> submitting our driver spec [4] was appropriate (not least to provide more
> context on the changes proposed in [2] and [3]).
>
> We're extremely keen to hear any and all feedback on these proposals from
> the community.  We'll be around at the Paris summit in a couple of weeks and
> would love to discuss with anyone else who is interested in this direction.
>
> Regards,
>
> Cory Benfield (on behalf of the entire Project Calico team)
>
> [1] http://www.projectcalico.org
> [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/vif-type-routed
> [3] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/dhcp-for-routed-ifs
> [4] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/calico-mechanism-driver
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to