On Sunday, November 2, 2014, John Dennis <jden...@redhat.com> wrote: > It was hoped we could simply borrow the Keystone mapping > implementation but it was found to be too limiting and not sufficiently > expressive. We could not find another alternative so we designed a new > mapper which is described in this PDF. >
In what way was it too limited? Did you consider extending the existing grammar and extending the existing mapping engine?
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
