On Sunday, November 2, 2014, John Dennis <jden...@redhat.com> wrote:

> It was hoped we could simply borrow the Keystone mapping
> implementation but it was found to be too limiting and not sufficiently
> expressive. We could not find another alternative so we designed a new
> mapper which is described in this PDF.

In what way was it too limited? Did you consider extending the
existing grammar and extending the existing mapping engine?
OpenStack-dev mailing list

Reply via email to