I am +1 for using cobbler as power management before we merge Ironic-based stuff. It is essential part also for our HA and stop provisioning/deployment mechanism.
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Dmitriy Shulyak <dshul...@mirantis.com> wrote: > Not long time ago we discussed necessity of power management feature in > Fuel. > > What is your opinion on power management support in Cobbler, i took a look > at documentation [1] and templates [2] that we have right now. > And it actually looks like we can make use of it. > > The only issue is that power address that cobbler system is configured > with is wrong. > Because provisioning serializer uses one reported by boostrap, but it can > be easily fixed. > > Ofcourse another question is separate network for power management, but we > can leave with > admin for now. > > Please share your opinions on this matter. Thanks > > [1] http://www.cobblerd.org/manuals/2.6.0/4/5_-_Power_Management.html > [2] http://paste.openstack.org/show/129063/ > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -- Yours Faithfully, Vladimir Kuklin, Fuel Library Tech Lead, Mirantis, Inc. +7 (495) 640-49-04 +7 (926) 702-39-68 Skype kuklinvv 45bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str. Moscow, Russia, www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/> www.mirantis.ru vkuk...@mirantis.com
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
