Yuriy, what’s the status of the rootwrap-daemon implementation on the nova side?, was it merged?, otherwise do you think there could be anyone interested in picking it up?
Best regards, -- Miguel Ángel Ajo Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) On Friday, 7 de November de 2014 at 11:52, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote: > Ohh, sad to hear that Yuriy, you were doing an awesome work. I will take some > time to re-review the final state of the code and specs, and move it forward. > Thank you very much for your contribution. > > -- > Miguel Ángel Ajo > Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) > > > On Friday, 7 de November de 2014 at 11:44, Yuriy Taraday wrote: > > > Hello, Miguel. > > > > I switched departments recently and unfortunately don't have much free time > > for community work. Feel free to pick up my change requests and push them > > if you have time. I'll try to keep track of these changes and give some > > feedback on them on occasion, but don't wait on me. > > Thank you for keeping this feature in mind. I'd be glad to see it finally > > used in Neutron (and any other project). > > > > -- > > > > Kind regards, Yuriy. > > > > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo <[email protected] > > (mailto:[email protected])> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Yorik, > > > > > > I was talking with Mark Mcclain a minute ago here at the summit about > > > this. And he told me that now at the start of the cycle looks like a good > > > moment to merge the spec & the root wrap daemon bits, so we have a lot of > > > headroom for testing during the next months. > > > > > > We need to upgrade the spec [1] to the new Kilo format. > > > > > > Do you have some time to do it?, I can allocate some time and do it > > > right away. > > > > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93889/ > > > -- > > > Miguel Ángel Ajo > > > Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig) > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, 24 de July de 2014 at 01:42, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote: > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com > > > > (http://www.nitrodesk.com)) > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Yuriy Taraday [[email protected] (mailto:[email protected])] > > > > Received: Thursday, 24 Jul 2014, 0:42 > > > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List > > > > [[email protected] > > > > (mailto:[email protected])] > > > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Spec freeze exception] Rootwrap > > > > daemon mode support > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > I'd like to propose making a spec freeze exception for > > > > rootwrap-daemon-mode spec [1]. > > > > > > > > Its goal is to save agents' execution time by using daemon mode for > > > > rootwrap and thus avoiding python interpreter startup time as well as > > > > sudo overhead for each call. Preliminary benchmark shows 10x+ speedup > > > > of the rootwrap interaction itself. > > > > > > > > This spec have a number of supporters from Neutron team (Carl and > > > > Miguel gave it their +2 and +1) and have all code waiting for review > > > > [2], [3], [4]. > > > > The only thing that has been blocking its progress is Mark's -2 left > > > > when oslo.rootwrap spec hasn't been merged yet. Now that's not the case > > > > and code in oslo.rootwrap is steadily getting approved [5]. > > > > > > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/93889 > > > > [2] https://review.openstack.org/82787 > > > > [3] https://review.openstack.org/84667 > > > > [4] https://review.openstack.org/107386 > > > > [5] > > > > https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.rootwrap+topic:bp/rootwrap-daemon-mode,n,z > > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
