+1. I think this is an important feature and I'd be happy to do reviews
when needed - hopefully this can get in by Kilo! :)

On 11/08/2014 12:24 PM, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi Miguel,
> 
> Thanks for picking this up. Pull me in and I'd be happy to help!
> 
> Cheers,
> Armando
> 
> On 7 November 2014 10:05, Miguel Ángel Ajo <majop...@redhat.com
> <mailto:majop...@redhat.com>> wrote:
> 
> 
>     Hi Yorik,
> 
>        I was talking with Mark Mcclain a minute ago here at the summit
>     about this. And he told me that now at the start of the cycle looks
>     like a good moment to merge the spec & the root wrap daemon bits, so
>     we have a lot of headroom for testing during the next months.
> 
>        We need to upgrade the spec [1] to the new Kilo format.
> 
>        Do you have some time to do it?, I can allocate some time and do
>     it right away.
> 
>     [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93889/
>     -- 
>     Miguel Ángel Ajo
>     Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
> 
>     On Thursday, 24 de July de 2014 at 01:42, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
> 
>>     +1
>>
>>     Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com
>>     <http://www.nitrodesk.com>)
>>
>>
>>     -----Original Message-----
>>     From: Yuriy Taraday [yorik....@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:yorik....@gmail.com>]
>>     Received: Thursday, 24 Jul 2014, 0:42
>>     To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>>     [openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>     <mailto:openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>]
>>     Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Spec freeze exception] Rootwrap
>>     daemon     mode support
>>
>>
>>     Hello.
>>
>>     I'd like to propose making a spec freeze exception for
>>     rootwrap-daemon-mode spec [1].
>>
>>     Its goal is to save agents' execution time by using daemon mode
>>     for rootwrap and thus avoiding python interpreter startup time as
>>     well as sudo overhead for each call. Preliminary benchmark shows
>>     10x+ speedup of the rootwrap interaction itself.
>>
>>     This spec have a number of supporters from Neutron team (Carl and
>>     Miguel gave it their +2 and +1) and have all code waiting for
>>     review [2], [3], [4].
>>     The only thing that has been blocking its progress is Mark's -2
>>     left when oslo.rootwrap spec hasn't been merged yet. Now that's
>>     not the case and code in oslo.rootwrap is steadily getting
>>     approved [5].
>>
>>     [1] https://review.openstack.org/93889
>>     [2] https://review.openstack.org/82787
>>     [3] https://review.openstack.org/84667
>>     [4] https://review.openstack.org/107386
>>     [5] 
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.rootwrap+topic:bp/rootwrap-daemon-mode,n,z
>>
>>     -- 
>>
>>     Kind regards, Yuriy.
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>     OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to