+1 I think the best use of our time is to discuss new features and functions that may have a api or functional impact for ironic or projects that depend on ironic.
Chris Krelle On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Ghe Rivero <g...@debian.org> wrote: > I agree that a lot of time is missed with the announcement and status > reports, but mostly because irc is a slow bandwidth communication channel > (like waiting several minutes for a 3 lines announcement to be written) > > I propose that any announcement and project status must be written in > advanced to an etherpad, and during the irc meeting just have a slot for > people to discuss anything that need further explanation, only mentioning > the topic but not the content. > > Ghe Rivero > On Nov 13, 2014 5:08 PM, "Peeyush Gupta" <gpeey...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > wrote: > >> +1 >> >> I agree with Lucas. Sounds like a good idea. I guess if we could spare >> more time for discussing new features and requirements rather than >> asking for status, that would be helpful for everyone. >> >> On 11/13/2014 05:45 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes wrote: >> > This was discussed in the Contributor Meetup on Friday at the Summit >> > but I think it's important to share on the mail list too so we can get >> > more opnions/suggestions/comments about it. >> > >> > In the Ironic weekly meeting we dedicate a good time of the meeting to >> > do some announcements, reporting bug status, CI status, oslo status, >> > specific drivers status, etc... It's all good information, but I >> > believe that the mail list would be a better place to report it and >> > then we can free some time from our meeting to actually discuss >> > things. >> > >> > Are you guys in favor of it? >> > >> > If so I'd like to propose a new format based on the discussions we had >> > in Paris. For the people doing the status report on the meeting, they >> > would start adding the status to an etherpad and then we would have a >> > responsible person to get this information and send it to the mail >> > list once a week. >> > >> > For the meeting itself we have a wiki page with an agenda[1] which >> > everyone can edit to put the topic they want to discuss in the meeting >> > there, I think that's fine and works. The only change about it would >> > be that we may want freeze the agenda 2 days before the meeting so >> > people can take a look at the topics that will be discussed and >> > prepare for it; With that we can move forward quicker with the >> > discussions because people will be familiar with the topics already. >> > >> > Let me know what you guys think. >> > >> > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic >> > >> > Lucas >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OpenStack-dev mailing list >> > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >> >> -- >> Peeyush Gupta >> gpeey...@linux.vnet.ibm.com >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev