Thanks guys. I think you've answered my initial question. Probably not in the way I was hoping it to be answered, but it's ok.
So now we have potentially 4 different blueprint describing more or less overlapping use cases that we need to reconcile into one? If the above is correct, then I suggest we go back to the use case and make an effort to abstract a bit from thinking about how those use cases should be implemented. Salvatore On 14 November 2014 15:42, Igor Cardoso <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > Also, what about Kevin's https://review.openstack.org/#/c/87825/? One of > its use cases is exactly the L2 gateway. These proposals could probably be > inserted in a more generic work for moving existing datacenter L2 resources > to Neutron. > Cheers, > > On 14 November 2014 15:28, Mathieu Rohon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> As far as I understood last friday afternoon dicussions during the >> design summit, this use case is in the scope of another umbrella spec >> which would define external connectivity for neutron networks. Details >> of those connectivity would be defined through service plugin API. >> >> Ian do you plan to define such an umbrella spec? or at least, could >> you sum up the agreement of the design summit discussion in the ML? >> >> I see at least 3 specs which would be under such an umbrella spec : >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93329/ (BGPVPN) >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/101043/ (Inter DC connectivity with VPN) >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134179/ (l2 gw aas) >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Salvatore Orlando <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Thanks Maruti, >> > >> > I have some comments and questions which I've posted on gerrit. >> > There are two things I would like to discuss on the mailing list >> concerning >> > this effort. >> > >> > 1) Is this spec replacing https://review.openstack.org/#/c/100278 and >> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93613 - I hope so, otherwise this >> just adds >> > even more complexity. >> > >> > 2) It sounds like you should be able to implement this service plugin in >> > either a feature branch or a repository distinct from neutron. Can you >> > confirm that? >> > >> > Salvatore >> > >> > On 13 November 2014 13:26, Kamat, Maruti Haridas <[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi Friends, >> >> >> >> As discussed during the summit, I have uploaded the spec for >> review >> >> at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/134179/ >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Maruti >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> >> [email protected] >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > OpenStack-dev mailing list >> > [email protected] >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> OpenStack-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> > > > > -- > Igor Duarte Cardoso. > http://igordcard.com > @igordcard <https://twitter.com/igordcard> > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
