On 11/24/2014 01:22 PM, Trevor McKay wrote:
Hello all,

   at our last Sahara IRC meeting we started discussing whether or not to add
a global requirement for cm_api.py https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130153/

   One issue (but not the only issue) is that cm_api is not packaged for Fedora,
Centos, or Ubuntu currently. The global requirements README points out that 
adding
requirements for a new dependency more or less forces the distros to package the
dependency for the next OS release.

   Given that cm_api is needed for a plugin, but not for core Sahara 
functionality,
should we request that the global requirement be added, or should we seek to add
a global requirement only if/when cm_api is packaged?

   Alternatively, can we support the plugin with additional documentation (ie, 
how
to install cm_api on the Sahara node)?

   Those present at the meeting agreed that it was probably better to defer a 
global
requirement until/unless cm_api is packaged to avoid a burden on the distros.

   Thoughts?

Best,

Trevor

Minutes: 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-11-20-18.01.html
Logs: 
http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/sahara/2014/sahara.2014-11-20-18.01.log.html
https://github.com/openstack/requirements

we should keep the global requirements request, use it to track satisfying all the "global requirements" requirements, even if that involves including cm_api in relevant distros. additionally, in parallel, provide documentation the addresses how to install & use the CDH plugin.

i don't think we should officially enable/support the plugin in sahara until it can be deployed w/o external/3rd-party steps.

best,


matt

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to