Folks, Maybe I understand some things wrong, but Zabbix is a different story. We deploy Zabbix per cluster, so it doesn't monitor for *all* slaves or master node. It monitors only one cluster.
Therefore I see no reasons to choose Zabbix over monit. I mean, it shouldn't be "We MUST use Zabbix because we use it for our clusters". - Igor P.S: Personally, I'd like to use either Monit or Sensu. On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Jay Pipes <jaypi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/26/2014 08:18 AM, Fox, Kevin M wrote: >> >> So then in the end, there will be 3 monitoring systems to learn, >> configure, and debug? Monasca for cloud users, zabbix for most of the >> physical systems, and sensu or monit "to be small"? >> >> Seems very complicated. >> >> If not just monasca, why not the zabbix thats already being deployed? > > > Yes, I had the same thoughts... why not just use zabbix since it's used > already? > > Best, > -jay > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev