On 12/03/2014 06:24 PM, Sukhdev Kapur wrote:
Congratulations Henry and Kevin. It has always been pleasure working
with you guys.....
If I may express my opinion, Bob's contribution to ML2 has been quite
substantial. The kind of stability ML2 has achieved makes a statement
of his dedication to this work. I have worked very closely with Bob on
several issues and co-chaired ML2-Subteam with him and have developed
tremendous respect for his dedication.
Reading his email reply makes me believe he wants to continue to
contribute as core developer. Therefore, I would like to take an
opportunity to appeal to the core team to consider granting him his
wish - i.e. vote -1 on his removal.
If I might venture an outside voice in support of Bob: you don't want
to chase away the continuity. Yes, sometimes the day job makes us focus
on things other than upstream work for a while, but I would say that you
should err on the side of keeping someone that is otherwise still
engaged. Especially when that core has been as fundamental on a project
as I know Bob to have been on Quantum....er Neutron.
regards..
-Sukhdev
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Edgar Magana
<edgar.mag...@workday.com <mailto:edgar.mag...@workday.com>> wrote:
I give +2 to Henry and Kevin. So, Congratulations Folks!
I have been working with both of them and great quality reviews
are always
coming out from them.
Many thanks to Nachi and Bob for their hard work!
Edgar
On 12/2/14, 7:59 AM, "Kyle Mestery" <mest...@mestery.com
<mailto:mest...@mestery.com>> wrote:
>Now that we're in the thick of working hard on Kilo deliverables, I'd
>like to make some changes to the neutron core team. Reviews are the
>most important part of being a core reviewer, so we need to ensure
>cores are doing reviews. The stats for the 180 day period [1]
indicate
>some changes are needed for cores who are no longer reviewing.
>
>First of all, I'm proposing we remove Bob Kukura and Nachi Ueno from
>neutron-core. Bob and Nachi have been core members for a while now.
>They have contributed to Neutron over the years in reviews, code and
>leading sub-teams. I'd like to thank them for all that they have done
>over the years. I'd also like to propose that should they start
>reviewing more going forward the core team looks to fast track them
>back into neutron-core. But for now, their review stats place them
>below the rest of the team for 180 days.
>
>As part of the changes, I'd also like to propose two new members to
>neutron-core: Henry Gessau and Kevin Benton. Both Henry and Kevin
have
>been very active in reviews, meetings, and code for a while now.
Henry
>lead the DB team which fixed Neutron DB migrations during Juno. Kevin
>has been actively working across all of Neutron, he's done some great
>work on security fixes and stability fixes in particular. Their
>comments in reviews are insightful and they have helped to
onboard new
>reviewers and taken the time to work with people on their patches.
>
>Existing neutron cores, please vote +1/-1 for the addition of Henry
>and Kevin to the core team.
>
>Thanks!
>Kyle
>
>[1] http://stackalytics.com/report/contribution/neutron-group/180
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
