Hi AFAIK there are no products out there using tripleo&nova-bm, but maybe a quick post to -operators asking if this will ruin anyone's day, would be good?
Cheers, -- Chris Jones > On 4 Dec 2014, at 04:47, Steve Kowalik <ste...@wedontsleep.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm becoming increasingly concerned about all of the code paths > in tripleo-incubator that check $USE_IRONIC -eq 0 -- that is, use > nova-baremetal rather than Ironic. We do not check nova-bm support in > CI, haven't for at least a month, and I'm concerned that parts of it > may be slowly bit-rotting. > > I think our documentation is fairly clear that nova-baremetal is > deprecated and Ironic is the way forward, and I know it flies in the > face of backwards-compatibility, but do we want to bite the bullet and > remove nova-bm support? > > Cheers, > -- > Steve > Oh, in case you got covered in that Repulsion Gel, here's some advice > the lab boys gave me: [paper rustling] DO NOT get covered in the > Repulsion Gel. > - Cave Johnson, CEO of Aperture Science > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStackfirstname.lastname@example.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStackemail@example.com http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev