On 12/04/2014 05:38 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/4/2014 4:06 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>> +Eric and Ian
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Matt Riedemann
>> <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>> This came up in the nova meeting today, I've opened a bug [1] for it.
>>> Since
>>> this isn't maintained by infra we don't have log indexing so I can't use
>>> logstash to see how pervasive it us, but multiple people are
>>> reporting the
>>> same thing in IRC.
>>>
>>> Who is maintaining the nova-docker CI and can look at this?
>>>
>>> It also looks like the log format for the nova-docker CI is a bit
>>> weird, can
>>> that be cleaned up to be more consistent with other CI log results?
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova-docker/+bug/1399443
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Matt Riedemann
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
> 
> Also, according to the 3rd party CI requirements [1] I should see
> nova-docker CI in the third party wiki page [2] so I can get details on
> who to contact when this fails but that's not done.
> 
> [1] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html#requirements
> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/ThirdPartySystems

It's not the 3rd party CI job we are talking about, it's the one in the
check queue which is run by infra.

But, more importantly, jobs in those queues need shepards that will fix
them. Otherwise they will get deleted.

Clarkb provided the fix for the log structure right now -
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/139237/1 so at least it will look
vaguely sane on failures

        -Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net

_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to