Kevin, thanks for the info! I agree with you. RFC is the authority. use payload in the DELETE isn't good way.
2014-12-09 7:58 GMT+08:00 Kevin L. Mitchell <[email protected]>: > On Tue, 2014-12-09 at 07:38 +0800, Alex Xu wrote: > > Not sure all, nova is limited > > at > https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/api/openstack/wsgi.py#L79 > > That under our control. > > It is, but the client frameworks aren't, and some of them prohibit > sending a body with a DELETE request. Further, RFC7231 has this to say > about DELETE request bodies: > > A payload within a DELETE request message has no defined semantics; > sending a payload body on a DELETE request might cause some > existing > implementations to reject the request. > > (ยง4.3.5) > > I think we have to conclude that, if we need a request body, we cannot > use the DELETE method. We can modify the operation, such as setting a > "force" flag, with a query parameter on the URI, but a request body > should be considered out of bounds with respect to DELETE. > > > Maybe not just ask question for delete, also for other method. > > > > 2014-12-09 1:11 GMT+08:00 Kevin L. Mitchell < > [email protected]>: > > On Mon, 2014-12-08 at 14:07 +0800, Eli Qiao wrote: > > > I wonder if we can use body in delete, currently , there isn't > any > > > case used in v2/v3 api. > > > > No, many frameworks raise an error if you try to include a body > with a > > DELETE request. > > -- > > Kevin L. Mitchell <[email protected]> > > Rackspace > > -- > Kevin L. Mitchell <[email protected]> > Rackspace > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
