OK, I was going to implement something for neutron, but if you're going
to handle it quickly till the end of the week, I'll wait to steal. ;)
On 01/08/2015 07:14 PM, Jay Bryant wrote:
We talked about this in Cinder. I am planning to create some hacking
checks for us just to be safe. Shouldn't take a ton of effort.
Jay
On Jan 8, 2015 12:03 PM, "Doug Hellmann" <d...@doughellmann.com
<mailto:d...@doughellmann.com>> wrote:
> On Jan 8, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka
<ihrac...@redhat.com <mailto:ihrac...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> On 01/05/2015 04:51 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>> As each library is released, we will send release notes to this
list, as usual. At that point the Oslo liaisons should start
planning patches to change imports in their projects from
"oslo.foo" to “oslo_foo". The old imports should still work for
now, but new features will not be added to the old namespace, so
over time it will be necessary to make the changes anyway. We are
likely to remove the old namespace package completely during the
next release cycle, but that hasn't been decided.
>
> Making the switch probably requires us to add some hacking rule
that would forbid old namespace based imports, right? Do we by
chance have such a rule implemented anywhere?
I’m not sure that’s something we need to enforce. Liaisons should
be updating projects now as we release libraries, and then we’ll
consider whether we can drop the namespace packages when we plan
the next cycle.
Doug
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
<mailto:OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
