Excerpts from James Polley's message of 2015-01-14 12:46:37 -0800: > Thanks for the nomination Clint (and +1s from people who have already > responded) > > At this stage, I believe we've traditionally[1] asked[2] the potential new > Core Reviewer to commit to 3 reviews per work-day. > > I don't feel that that's a commitment I can make at this point. It's not > something I've been able to achieve in the past - I've come close over the > last 30 days, but the 90 day report shows me barely above 2 per day. I > think my current throughput is something I can commit to maintaining, and > I'd like to think that it can grow over time; but I don't think I can > commit to doing anything more than I've already been able to do. > > If the rest of the core reviewers think I'm still making a valuable > contribution, I'm more than happy to accept this nomination. >
IMO we need to re-evaluate that requirement. None of us has done a great job at sustaining it, however as a team we've managed to at least get enough reviews done to keep the tubes flowing. I know that at one point we got really backed up, but what solved that was a combination of a few less patches getting submitted (probably because of the long wait time) and a few more reviewers being added. So having more good reviewers like yourself seems more important than having more perfect reviewers. Also the main reason for wanting people to do 3 per day is to maintain familiarity with the code. I think you've been able to remain familiar with your traditional rate just fine. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
