+1, no objections from my side. On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Roman Prykhodchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi folks! > > After moving python-fuelclient to its own repo some of you started asking a > good question which is How do we manage core rights in different Fuel > repositories. The problem is that there is a single fuel-core group which is > used for all fuel-* repos, except for python-fuelclient. > > The approach mentioned above does not work very well at the moment and so I’d > like to propose a different one: > > - Every new or separated project shoud introduce it’s own -core group. > - That group vill only contain active core reviewers for only that project. > - Removing or adding people will be done according to Approved OpenStack > rules. > - fuel-core group will be reduced to the smallest possible number of people > and only include the guys > who must have decision making powers according to Fuel project’s rules. > - fuel-core will be included to any other fuel-*core group > - elections to the fuel-core group will take place according to Fuel’s > policies > - fuel-core group members are required for supervising reasons and taking an > action in emergency cases > > > - romcheg > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
