On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 07:35:46PM +0300, Alexandre Levine wrote: > Thank you Sean. > > We'll be tons of EC2 Tempest tests for your attention shortly. > How would you prefer them? In several reviews, I believe. Not in one, right?
Let's take a step back for a sec. How many tests and what kind are we talking about here? I'm thinking it might be better to not just try and dump all this stuff in tempest. While in the past we've just dumped all of this in tempest, moving forward I don't think that's what we want to be doing. The current ec2 tests have always felt out of place to me in tempest and historically haven't been maintained as well as the other tests. If we're talking about ramping up the ec2 testing we probably should look at migrating everything elsewhere, especially given that it just essentially nova testing. I see 2 better options here: we either put the tests in the tree for the project with the ec2 implementation, or we create a new repo like tempest-ec2 for testing this. In either case we'll leverage tempest-lib to make sure the bits your existing testing is relying on are consumable outside of the tempest repo. -Matt Treinish > On 2/2/15 6:55 PM, Sean Dague wrote: > >On 02/02/2015 07:01 AM, Alexandre Levine wrote: > >>Michael, > >> > >>I'm rather new here, especially in regard to communication matters, so > >>I'd also be glad to understand how it's done and then I can drive it if > >>it's ok with everybody. > >>By saying EC2 sub team - who did you keep in mind? From my team 3 > >>persons are involved. > >> > >> From the technical point of view the transition plan could look somewhat > >>like this (sequence can be different): > >> > >>1. Triage EC2 bugs and fix showstoppers in nova's EC2. > >>2. Contribute Tempest tests for EC2 functionality and employ them > >>against nova's EC2. > >>3. Write spec for required API to be exposed from nova so that we get > >>full info. > >>4. Triage and fix all of the existing nova's EC2 bugs worth fixing. > >>5. Set up Tempest testing of the stackforge/ec2 (if that's possible). > >>6. Communicate and discover all of the existing questions and > >>problematic points for the switching from existing EC2 API to the new > >>one. Provide solutions or decisions about them. > >>7. Do performance testing of the new stackforge/ec2 and provide fixes if > >>any bottlenecks come up. > >>8. Have all of the above prepared for the Vancouver summit and discuss > >>the situation there. > >> > >>Michael, I am still wondering, who's going to be responsible for timely > >>reviews and approvals of the fixes and tests we're going to contribute > >>to nova? So far this is the biggest risk. Is there anyway to allow some > >>of us to participate in the process? > >I am happy to volunteer to shephard these reviews. I'll try to keep an > >eye on them, and if something is blocking please just ping me directly > >on IRC in #openstack-nova or bring them forward to the weekly Nova meeting. > > > > -Sean > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev