On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 11:49:26AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > On 02/02/2015 10:51 AM, Jay Pipes wrote: > >This is a bug that I discovered when fixing some of the NUMA related nova > >objects. I have a patch that should fix it up shortly. > > Any chance you could point me at it or send it to me? > > >This is what happens when we don't have any functional testing of stuff that > >is > >merged into master... > > Indeed. Does tempest support hugepages/NUMA/pinning?
The short answer is not explicitly. The longer answer is that there are 2 patches up for review right now that add basic checks to tempest. But, they haven't been able to merge because the nova support hasn't worked and the tests fail... Aside from those 2 basic checks I don't expect any other direct numa, hugepage, etc. tests to be in tempest. Testing anything besides these basic cases would require knowledge of the underlying hardware for the deployment, which is out of scope for tempest. There really needs to be lower level functional testing of these features. That being said the other thing you could do using tempest is to configure tempest to use flavors which are created to use numa. That would at least implicitly test that the functionality would work. But, that really isn't a replacement for the functional testing which is sorely needed here.  https://review.openstack.org/143540  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/143541/ -Matt Treinish
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev