On 2/2/2015 3:52 PM, Kurt Taylor wrote:
Thanks Morgan, That's why I wanted to email. We will gladly come to a meeting and formally request to comment and will turn off commenting on Keystone until then. Thanks, Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Morgan Fainberg <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I assumed [my mistake] this was not commenting/reporting, just running against Keystone. I expect a more specific request to comment rather than a “hey we’re doing this” if commenting is what is desired. Please come to our weekly meeting if you’re planning on commenting/scoring on keystone patches. -- Morgan Fainberg On February 2, 2015 at 1:41:08 PM, Anita Kuno ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) wrote:On 02/02/2015 02:16 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote: > Thank you for the heads up. > > —Morgan > > -- > Morgan Fainberg > > On February 2, 2015 at 1:15:49 PM, Kurt Taylor ([email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>) wrote: > > Just FYI, in case there was any questions, > > In addition to testing and reporting on Nova, the IBM PowerKVM CI system is now also testing against Keystone patches. > > We are happy to also be testing keystone patches on PowerKVM, and will be adding other projects soon. > > Regards, > Kurt Taylor (krtaylor) > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe <http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe:[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe <http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > Requesting permission to comment on a new repo is best done at the weekly meeting of the project in question, not the mailing list. Thanks, Anita. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe <http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe <http://[email protected]?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
Sorry for being naive, but what in Keystone is arch-specific such that it could be different on ppc64 vs x86_64? Or is there more to PowerKVM CI than the name implies?
-- Thanks, Matt Riedemann __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
