On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Matt Riedemann <mrie...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On 2/2/2015 3:52 PM, Kurt Taylor wrote:
>
>> Thanks Morgan, That's why I wanted to email. We will gladly come to a
>> meeting and formally request to comment and will turn off commenting on
>> Keystone until then.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Morgan Fainberg
>> <morgan.fainb...@gmail.com <mailto:morgan.fainb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     I assumed [my mistake] this was not commenting/reporting, just
>>     running against Keystone. I expect a more specific request to
>>     comment rather than a “hey we’re doing this” if commenting is what
>>     is desired.
>>
>>     Please come to our weekly meeting if you’re planning on
>>     commenting/scoring on keystone patches.
>>
>>     --
>>     Morgan Fainberg
>>
>>     On February 2, 2015 at 1:41:08 PM, Anita Kuno (ante...@anteaya.info
>>     <mailto:ante...@anteaya.info>) wrote:
>>
>>      On 02/02/2015 02:16 PM, Morgan Fainberg wrote:
>>>     > Thank you for the heads up.
>>>     >
>>>     > —Morgan
>>>     >
>>>     > --
>>>     > Morgan Fainberg
>>>     >
>>>     > On February 2, 2015 at 1:15:49 PM, Kurt Taylor (
>>> kurt.r.tay...@gmail.com <mailto:kurt.r.tay...@gmail.com>) wrote:
>>>     >
>>>     > Just FYI, in case there was any questions,
>>>     >
>>>     > In addition to testing and reporting on Nova, the IBM PowerKVM CI
>>> system is now also testing against Keystone patches.
>>>     >
>>>     > We are happy to also be testing keystone patches on PowerKVM, and
>>> will be adding other projects soon.
>>>     >
>>>     > Regards,
>>>     > Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)
>>>
>>>
> Sorry for being naive, but what in Keystone is arch-specific such that it
> could be different on ppc64 vs x86_64?  Or is there more to PowerKVM CI
> than the name implies?
>
>
No, it's a good question. We plan on testing many different repos or
components in L1 and beyond. It is a quality statement really, to assure
anyone wanting to run OpenStack on a different platform that some set of
tests against some set of core components had been run.

We were starting with the L1 components with Nova first (as you know) and
adding from there. However, I of all people should know better than to turn
on comments for this new component without discussing it at the component's
meeting. I'm on the agenda for Keystone, please feel free to attend and
discuss.  https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/KeystoneMeeting

Thanks,
Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)

-- 
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt Riedemann
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to