Miguel Ángel Ajo

On Wednesday, 4 de February de 2015 at 10:41, Cory Benfield wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:59:54, Kevin Benton wrote:
> > I proposed an alternative to adjusting the lease time early on the in
> > the thread. By specifying the renewal time (DHCP option 58), we can
> > have
> > the benefits of a long lease time (resiliency to long DHCP server
> > outages) while having a frequent renewal interval to check for IP
> > changes. I favored this approach because it only required a patch to
> > dnsmasq to allow that option to be set and patch to our agent to set
> > that option, both of which are pretty straight-forward.
> >  
> It's hard to see a downside to this proposal. Even if one of the other ideas 
> goes forward as well, a short DHCP renewal interval feels like a very good 
> idea to me.

I understand some dhcp-clients could ignore option 58, but yet, I understand
they will obey the longer lease time, without affecting they behavior.

So only who really needs it would take care of using fully compliant clients…

OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe

Reply via email to