On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 10:24:24AM -0600, Kurt Taylor wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Daniel P. Berrange <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Team Nova, > > > > > > This is a message to alert everyone to the fact that the old hypervisor > > > support matrix on the wiki[1], should really be considered obsolete. > > > > > > The canonical location for it going forward will be > > > > > > http://docs.openstack.org/developer/nova/support-matrix.html > > > > > > That URL shows current GIT snapshot, releases will get their own URL > > > when the time comes. > > > > > > The source for this document is part of Nova GIT in the path > > > > > > doc/source/support-matrix.ini > > > > > > The docs are auto-generated from that ini file using a sphinx extension > > > > > > doc/ext/support_matrix.py > > > > > > The CSS styling is in > > > > > > doc/source/_static/support-matrix.css > > > > > > Some things to note here > > > > > > - The new doc was populated based on the contents of the old wiki page > > > from > > > about two months ago, so if there have been additions to the wiki in > > > that > > > time, they might not all have been captured - depends how good I > was at > > > figuring out changes. > > > > > > - Improvements to the content and/or HTML styling should obviously be > sent > > > as patches to Nova GIT in the files mentioned above, via normal > Gerrit > > > review practice. > > > > > > - Since it is in GIT, the support matrix is now able to record > information > > > per release branch of Nova. So users can be clear about what > features > > > their release of Nova supports, as opposed to playing guessing > games. > > > > > > - The in-tree document only covers features of the in-tree Nova > drivers. > > > As such it does not include information about Docker or PowerKVM or > > > the (now deleted) BareMetal drivers. My currently suggestion is that > > > people maintaining out of tree drivers, should reuse the sphinx > > > extension > > > to format their own support matrix ini file in their local GIT repo. > > > > > > > I think that maybe you have confused PowerKVM with PowerVM. The PowerVM > > driver was removed, but PowerKVM support is in tree with libvirt. > > Ok, so the wiki page was indeed referring to the libvirt impl. That wasn't > obvious since it didn't mention libvirt in the heading as all the other > libvirt columns did ! Sorry for not copying across your data then. > > Regards, > Daniel > No problem at all, here's the patch to add it: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/153342/ Kurt Taylor (krtaylor)
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
