Thierry Carrez <thie...@openstack.org> writes: > I also disagree with the proposed solution. We announced a support > timeframe for Icehouse, our downstream users made plans around it, so we > should stick to it as much as we can.
To be fair, if we did that, we did not communicate accurately the sentiment of the room at the Kilo summit. From: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-summit-ops-stable-branch Stable branches starting with stable/icehouse are intended to be supported for 15 months (previously it was 9 months), but it depends on the community dedicating resources to maintain stable/* There was definitely skepticism in that room. I would characterize it as something like "some people wanted 15 months" and other people said "that is unlikely to happen based on our track record". I think the consensus was akin to "okay, we'll try it and see what happens but no promises". -Jim __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
