Adding the right subject line.
From: Varun Lodaya <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 at 2:26 PM
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: port-create with network from a different tenant does not fail
Hi,
We were seeing this issue where if the user role is admin in 2 tenants A and B
and he issues neutron port-create <network-id> in tenant A where <network-id>
is in tenant B, it ends up creating that port. Ideally, it should have failed
since you cannot have the port/network in different tenants.
varunlodaya@ubuntu:~/devstack$ neutron port-show
fc6917ea-0c0c-4ec5-9202-4441701c9984
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Field | Value
|
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| admin_state_up | True
|
| allowed_address_pairs |
|
| binding:host_id |
|
| binding:profile | {}
|
| binding:vif_details | {}
|
| binding:vif_type | unbound
|
| binding:vnic_type | normal
|
| device_id |
|
| device_owner |
|
| extra_dhcp_opts |
|
| fixed_ips | {"subnet_id": "8c9f5682-daf8-40e1-9b6a-57cfed7f024c",
"ip_address": "10.1.1.13"} |
| id | fc6917ea-0c0c-4ec5-9202-4441701c9984
|
| mac_address | fa:16:3e:18:6e:95
|
| name |
|
| network_id | 0036a345-35ea-42c8-a66c-f9831d0a03a5
|
| security_groups | 45786089-d53f-4eec-8be6-cb49766e55c1
|
| status | DOWN
|
| tenant_id | d0d1e6e21268418b8888b0adcea413a3
|
+-----------------------+----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
varunlodaya@ubuntu:~/devstack$ neutron net-show
0036a345-35ea-42c8-a66c-f9831d0a03a5
+---------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| Field | Value |
+---------------------------+--------------------------------------+
| admin_state_up | True |
| id | 0036a345-35ea-42c8-a66c-f9831d0a03a5 |
| name | alt_private |
| provider:network_type | vxlan |
| provider:physical_network | |
| provider:segmentation_id | 1003 |
| router:external | False |
| shared | False |
| status | ACTIVE |
| subnets | 8c9f5682-daf8-40e1-9b6a-57cfed7f024c |
| tenant_id | 099bfd6e59434b51a479ab7142ff01df |
+---------------------------+--------------------------------------+
varunlodaya@ubuntu:~/devstack$
Is this an expected behavior or a known bug? Should I create a new one?
Thanks,
Varun
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
